豆包方面表示，相关作者在未向厂商报告漏洞信息的情况下，恶意传播并夸大漏洞风险。对此，豆包发布声明：
从这个角度看，MiniMax 推出这些产品，价值或许不只在于功能多了两个按钮，更在于它正在把一套原本属于少数人的先进工作范式，逐步变成更多人可以上手的日常工具。
。业内人士推荐雷电模拟器官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14